At 1st glance, there would appear to have been a lot of articles published over the last few days. There have & have not been. Most of these pieces are rehashed bits that they dressed up to have net appeal. Not that the info isn't important or relative, but it's not new or nationally newsworthy.
A piece from Yale touted a new, changing approach to how HIV is treated. It lightly detailed the history of the virus & the need for community involvement. Not breaking new info by any means.
These works are redressed, retooled & gussied up to look new, professional & promising. They repackaged & rebranded old information. Again, the info is important, but the presentation is questionable. In these hard times, sites are trying to at least appear relevant. When they really don't anything new to offer.
They've run out of steam, funds, nerve... These venues are trying to stay afloat. Visit the sites you read the most. Even if they don't have anything new. They might be to the point of depending on ad revenue for operational cost. If they lose that as well, it could be their end. This is siege war on pertinent HIV information & discussion.
Take care.
Cya...
No comments:
Post a Comment